PARC Projects

Provide protection against most harmful chemicals
Address chemical pollution in the natural environment
Harmonising quality of chemical and bio-effect directed suspect and non-target screening methods across fields
Environment
Human health
Monitoring methods
Time span
-
Potential impacts
  • Extending and consolidating a quality assurance and quality control framework for global use by end-users across various applications in environmental, food, and human biomonitoring fields.
  • Achieving more consistent and comparable data from suspect and non-target screening methods across multiple laboratories.
  • Gaining more insight in comparability of the results across studies by working towards a more quantitatively interpretable output.
Partners involved
ANSES (FR)
AU (DK)
AUTH (GR)
BfG (DE)
BRGM (FR)
EAWAG (CH)
EHESP (FR)
EV-ILVO (BE)
CSIC (ES)
INRAE (FR)
INRS (FR)
JSI (SI)
KWR (NL)
LNE (FR)
LNS (LU)
MU (CZ)
MUI (AT)
NILU (NO)
ONIRIS (FR)
ORU (SE)
SLU (SE)
UBA (DE)
UCPH (DK)
UFZ (DE)
WR (NL)
Contacts
Rosalie Nijssen (WFSR)
rosalie.nijssen [at] wur.nl
Karsten Beekmann (WFSR)
karsten.beekmann [at] wur.nl
Key messages
  • Novel suspect and non-screening methods are crucial to detect a wide range of chemicals that may not be well understood or prioritised. Quality assurance and quality control for these methods is not yet well established. In this project, a harmonised quality assurance and quality control framework will be developed and implemented.
Overview

Chemicals are present everywhere in the environment. To understand the risks they pose to human health and the environment, it is essential to have reliable data about their presence in the environment, food and the human body. Well-established procedures and internationally agreed guidelines exist to validate methods for targeted analysis, which involves testing or specific substances, such as lead.

These guidelines include steps for quality control, often using control samples that contain the target substance. This helps to produce high-quality data that is FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable), providing risk assessors with trustworthy data.

However, there are no universally accepted guidelines for suspect and non-targeted screening, which involves scanning samples for a wide range of unknown chemicals without a specific one in mind. This approach is crucial in research projects like the Partnership for the Assessment of Risks from Chemicals (PARC) to identify chemicals that may not yet be well understood or prioritised. Suspect and non-targeted screening methods, which use chemical or biological techniques, are still relatively new, and necessary quality control and quality assurance processes are not yet well established and harmonised.

This project aims to establish the essential quality standards needed specifically for suspect and non-targeted screening methods. These methods rely on advanced techniques such as chromatography, which separates complex chemical mixtures, and high-resolution mass spectrometry, a process that identifies substances by measuring their molecular weight, as well as biological assays that reveal the effects of chemicals on living systems. The project will catalogue current quality control and quality assessment guidelines across food, environmental and human biomonitoring domains, identify any inconsistencies or gaps, and work to align these standards across the application fields to ensure robust, consistent procedures for identifying unknown chemicals.

Achievements & Results

An inventory document summarizing existing quality assurance and quality control used in environmental, human biomonitoring and food screening methods was drafted.

Policy relevance

Improving the quality and comparability of the results obtained by screening and non-target methods makes the results more reliable and usable for risk assessment.

Related Publications

Address chemical pollution in the natural environment
Provide protection against most harmful chemicals
Shift away from animal testing
Biodiversity protection
Streamlining data processing methods for suspect and non-target screening
Environment
Health effects
Human health
Monitoring methods
Risk assessment
NGRA
Mixtures
Human biomonitoring
Workers

Harmonising quality of chemical and bio-effect directed suspect and non-target screening methods across fields

Time span
-
Potential impacts
  • Extending and consolidating a quality assurance and quality control framework for global use by end-users across various applications in environmental, food, and human biomonitoring fields.
  • Achieving more consistent and comparable data from suspect and non-target screening methods across multiple laboratories.
  • Gaining more insight in comparability of the results across studies by working towards a more quantitatively interpretable output.
ANSES (FR)
AU (DK)
AUTH (GR)
BfG (DE)
BRGM (FR)
EAWAG (CH)
EHESP (FR)
EV-ILVO (BE)
CSIC (ES)
INRAE (FR)
INRS (FR)
JSI (SI)
KWR (NL)
LNE (FR)
LNS (LU)
MU (CZ)
MUI (AT)
NILU (NO)
ONIRIS (FR)
ORU (SE)
SLU (SE)
UBA (DE)
UCPH (DK)
UFZ (DE)
WR (NL)
Key messages
  • Novel suspect and non-screening methods are crucial to detect a wide range of chemicals that may not be well understood or prioritised. Quality assurance and quality control for these methods is not yet well established. In this project, a harmonised quality assurance and quality control framework will be developed and implemented.
Overview

Chemicals are present everywhere in the environment. To understand the risks they pose to human health and the environment, it is essential to have reliable data about their presence in the environment, food and the human body. Well-established procedures and internationally agreed guidelines exist to validate methods for targeted analysis, which involves testing or specific substances, such as lead.

These guidelines include steps for quality control, often using control samples that contain the target substance. This helps to produce high-quality data that is FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable), providing risk assessors with trustworthy data.

However, there are no universally accepted guidelines for suspect and non-targeted screening, which involves scanning samples for a wide range of unknown chemicals without a specific one in mind. This approach is crucial in research projects like the Partnership for the Assessment of Risks from Chemicals (PARC) to identify chemicals that may not yet be well understood or prioritised. Suspect and non-targeted screening methods, which use chemical or biological techniques, are still relatively new, and necessary quality control and quality assurance processes are not yet well established and harmonised.

This project aims to establish the essential quality standards needed specifically for suspect and non-targeted screening methods. These methods rely on advanced techniques such as chromatography, which separates complex chemical mixtures, and high-resolution mass spectrometry, a process that identifies substances by measuring their molecular weight, as well as biological assays that reveal the effects of chemicals on living systems. The project will catalogue current quality control and quality assessment guidelines across food, environmental and human biomonitoring domains, identify any inconsistencies or gaps, and work to align these standards across the application fields to ensure robust, consistent procedures for identifying unknown chemicals.

Achievements & Results

An inventory document summarizing existing quality assurance and quality control used in environmental, human biomonitoring and food screening methods was drafted.

Policy relevance

Improving the quality and comparability of the results obtained by screening and non-target methods makes the results more reliable and usable for risk assessment.

Contacts
Rosalie Nijssen (WFSR)
rosalie.nijssen [at] wur.nl
Karsten Beekmann (WFSR)
karsten.beekmann [at] wur.nl
Topics
Provide protection against most harmful chemicals
Address chemical pollution in the natural environment
Keywords
Environment
Human health
Monitoring methods